I went to see Contagion, expecting a more or less standard issue disaster movie, but it turns out to be very different. Contagion went for the super-realism aspect of the disaster and I’d say it was more of a cross between magic realism and a documentary, which is to say it’s an odd beast of a movie.
The tag line for the movie is “Nothing spreads like fear.” Problem is, the movie didn’t focus on the fear. The movie focused mostly on the sober-headed public officials trying to track a population-killing virus and find a vaccination for it. Even the Matt Damon character who is supposed to give us a man-on-the-street view of the disaster is remarkably stoic given that he’s lost half his family to the contagion. The few scenes of civic panic and mayhem are much less dramatic than what you see in typical disaster movies.
But at the same time, I suspect that everything shown in this film is a much more realistic portrayal of what would happen in an epidemic outbreak like that. And so the movie’s creepiness comes from how easy it is to imagine it actually happening. Virtually every scene in the movie tracks the what the public officials are doing, how they use a network of researchers to learn how to reproduce the virus so they can work on a cure, how the work with governments and local officials, and the challenges they face in distributing vaccine to such large populations. Honestly, I felt like I was sitting in one of those grade school educational films most of the time.
What makes this movie at all interesting is that because it’s super realistic, it is also realistic about how individuals react to the crisis. All the characters are real people who occasionally demonstrate heroics, self-sacrifice, street-smarts, and compassion. They also demonstrate panic, fear, stupidity, greed, and abuse of authority, which complicates the battle against the contagion.
The one or two scenes in the movie that are not a documentary about how public officials battle the contagion suffer because we haven’t had enough time to explore the characters back-story. When the Bad Guy gets hauled away you kinda watch it with a detached compassion. When you get to see Matt Damon’s character coming to grips with his loss and making a first step to picking up the pieces of his life, you are watching the scene with a documentarian’s eye, not from a sympathetic perspecitve. It’s like, “yeah, people cry when they lose a loved one. Someone call a grief counselor.”
One aspect of the movie particularly stood out for me. The Jude Law character plays a sleazy citizen journalist who can’t get a job with a “real newspaper” and so he publishes his work on a web site. In the movie, he’s one of the first to notice the virus by noticing a video of one of the first victims. He quickly uses the video to boost traffic to his web site and he’s gets drunk on the influence he has with his followers. Next thing you know, he’s using his fame and influence to peddle snake oil “cures” for the virus thanks to some shady dealings with hedge fund operators who help him and themselves get rich selling the snake-oil.
So it kinda pisses me off that the only portrayal of bloggers and business men in the movie are negative. It’s certainly true that bloggers have to watch out for the temptations that come with fame and influence. But doesn’t everybody? Couldn’t they have spared a minute or two in the movie to show positive ways that citizen journalists can help people in a disaster? In a disaster like the one portrayed in this movie everyone has a part to play and everyone has a choice between doing right and wrong. Why do we get to see both sides of the public officials, but we only get to see the negative aspects of citizen journalists and business people?
Contagion is actually an interesting movie and I recommend it if you are into documentaries. Don’t go into expecting a typical disaster movie.